Questions+3-4+(Maria+Capetta)

Question 3: 1) Misc 2) 3) 4)
 * Where the word is in the speech
 * the content of the words
 * the effect the word has in the prompt
 * be able to find effect a word has
 * be able to read into the meaning behind the word
 * 1) Correct, hygenists of language is just a humourous name for someone who is concerned with cleaning up the english language
 * 2) Wrong, the article doesn't move away from the central argument to talk about hygenists. the word is only used once in the prompt
 * 3) Wrong, the word doesnt hold enough weight to be a counter arugement
 * 4) Close, but the word does not provide a change of approach to the subject. the authur doesnt change his main attack of the topic
 * 5) Wrong, Never in the piece does the writer address hygienists in the different time periods. It's not the main point of the article

Question 4: 1) Word/Phrase meaning 2) 3) 4)
 * Where the word is in the article
 * The hidden meaning of the word
 * How to infere about word meanings
 * how to pick between different answers based on close reading of the text
 * 1) Correct, the whole article is about getting rid of the poor language usage so obviouslly that would be the hidden meaning beind the use of weeds
 * 2) Wrong, they wouldn't get rid of obsolete terms if they're like the readers
 * 3) Wrong, never in the article do they talk about diction error and would focus more on usage channges
 * 4) Close, because could want to get rid of cliches, but cliches are basically obsolete terms
 * 5) Wrong, The weeds are not a metaphor for anything. If anything they're an personification