Nicole+Gololobov+RP+Post+1

__ The manner in which the information acquired during the period of finding knowledge will be presented in physical form to the public: __ I am planning to write an informative essay. The reason why I have chosen this approach is that it won't be as difficult as some of the others and will allow me to write about an issue without choosing an opinion, as there may be legitimate arguments from all sides. This approach serves to gather as much information on a topic as possible and combine the information into a readable format.

__ Sentences with a question mark at the end that may inspire thoughts that may possibly then lead to an idea for the paper that will involve knowledge that is gathered: __ Is low self-esteem or self-criticism bad? Is there progress in terms of how open-minded people are? Are you stupid if you enjoy stupid things?
 * Should art be realistic or strive for realism? **

__ The findings that were found at an earlier time than the things that will be found at a later time: __ Most people would say that art should be realistic at least when it comes to human psychology, otherwise, suspension of disbelief would be broken. However, art doesn't have to be realistic for others to like it, especially when it comes to fantasy, some experimental fiction, and surrealism, but at the same time, these forms may be criticized for being pretentious, weird, confusing, or "not real" and at best aren't considered as good or as classic as conventional forms. The same applies to art that presents a world view that is too light-hearted, though the extreme opposite is "real."

__ The insane troll logic behind why things are carried out in the manner that they are and not in another of equal promise: __ The question I highlighted is more immediately interesting than the others. Like many people, I read books, watch movies, and write, so art is a significant part of my life. I like learning about how it can be improved and how different people approach it. While doing research, one problem is that there may be too much information on the subject. I'll also have to decide how many sources from each viewpoint to cite. The research paper could focus on several facets, including:
 * The contrast between realistic and unrealistic styles and arguments for either
 * The amount of value society places on realism versus surrealism
 * The purpose of art in portraying reality
 * The danger that can arise from unrealistic depictions (though that might veer into things that aren't part of the main focus)
 * Cases when realism is criticized, like art that is "vulgar" or "gritty"