Questions+1-2+(Taylor+Pestorius)

__1) Question 1:__ A) is incorrect because it's not a shift, it provides evidence to support a point. B) is also evidence. C) is correct because it shifts from building up with evidence to an overall analysis. ("So what's really going on...") D) is a distractor. It's different from the beginning tone, but it's just evidence to help define the shift. E) is a piece of evidence defending "D".
 * Function/type: "shift" type question, meant indicate a "shift", change, or development in the writing.
 * To understand this question, one must pinpoint the tone and focus that predominates in the beginning of the text, then to keep watch for a development in the tone or focus.
 * One should understand the "storyline" of the piece, being able to identify the "rising action", "climax", and "falling action".
 * One needs to know how to define the different parts of the story (rising/falling action, climax)
 * One must know how to read.
 * One must know how to recognize words that indicate a shift such as "so" or "therefore".

__2) Question 2:__ A) is incorrect because the examples //are// the word origins. If they complained about faulty studies, they'd be complaining about their own studies. B) is incorrect because the examples are debating about grammar, and so they would not be hostile towards "tedious" debates. C) Distractor, misunderstandings of historical events are never even mentioned. D) Distractor, //they// are the ones making "snobbish rejections to modern vocabulary". They wouldn't be hostile towards this because it's what they themselves are doing. E) This is correct, because it is the only choice that could logically be correct. All examples speak out because they are hostile towards modern language usage, or "unnecessary changes in word usage" as the choice states.
 * Function/type: define the assertions/beliefs of Wallis, Johnson, and Swift.
 * To understand the question, one must create an exact overall definition for what the writer want to say/portray through the three examples.
 * One must understand the questions are about what the writer is trying to say, not about the examples themselves.
 * One must know how to find all the people in the text.
 * One must know how to read the quotes and evaluate what the writer tries to say with said quotes.